All articles

Does my day have to wait with me?

How to separate another person’s unknown choice from decisions about your time that you can make today.

Old metal keys in different shapes against a pale wooden surface with peeling paint.
Photo: yasemin . · License

A friend asks whether you will join them for a walk on Saturday. You are about to say yes, but stop. Perhaps your former partner will message that day. Perhaps they will suggest meeting. There is no arrangement, yet you want to keep the time free. Your keys stay by the door, and your weekend plan becomes “I don’t know yet.” It seems that until you know what will happen with that relationship, you cannot know what you will do yourself.

Waiting may connect with an important wish: to be remembered, receive an answer, experience closeness, or find out whether a possibility remains. You do not have to pretend that wish has disappeared. You can still check one distinction: are you waiting for something specific that has been agreed, or organizing your day around a possibility that currently has neither a promise nor a time?

The distinction matters practically. If you have agreed to exchange belongings at two o’clock, you have information you can plan around. If you are thinking, “Perhaps they will want to talk today,” you have a prediction. That prediction may carry considerable emotional meaning, but it is not an arrangement. It does not tell you how long to remain available or what you need to postpone.

Reviews of waiting research suggest that uncertainty can itself become a difficult part of the experience. People are not only waiting for news: they are trying to prepare for different possibilities while living their present day. Much of this research concerns exam or medical results. It helps explain the difficulty of waiting, but does not directly explain your relationship. Sweeny, 2018.

Perhaps staying available feels like protecting an important possibility. Perhaps going out with a friend feels like giving up something you still hope for. This is one possible interpretation, which may or may not fit. It is worth asking more specifically: would a plan lasting a few hours actually prevent you from reading a message later and deciding how to respond? Is there a real arrangement that currently requires your presence?

Sometimes two different decisions become tangled in one question. “Will that person want to return?” and “Do I want to take a walk on Saturday?” The first also depends on another person’s choices, which you do not know. The second can be answered according to your present feelings, wishes, and circumstances. Not having an answer to one does not automatically remove your ability to answer the other.

NHS self-help guidance suggests distinguishing problems you can take practical action on from hypothetical worries beyond your control. That distinction can be cautiously applied here: perhaps you cannot determine whether a message will arrive, but you can choose whether to eat lunch, see a friend, or rest today. This is not a promise that making a choice will stop the anxiety. NHS guidance; publication year not stated.

It may help to separate four things. Feeling: “I feel hopeful and anxious.” Thought: “If I am not available, I will lose my only chance.” Need: “I want connection, and I also want a day of my own.” Possible action: “I will choose one short plan that does not require an answer about our future.” These words are not a conclusion about you. You can replace them with your own or find that they do not fit.

Perhaps your chosen plan will be very small. Half an hour outdoors rather than the whole weekend. A specific time to eat rather than a promise to enjoy an evening. You may also decide not to meet anyone today because you need rest. The useful check is whether you are choosing according to a present need or solely to remain ready for an undefined possibility.

The choice does not have to be a final statement about the relationship. Putting a plan in your calendar does not mean deciding that you will never want to talk again. You are deciding about one part of one day. If new information arrives later, you can consider it. Until then, you can plan according to what you know now, without pretending that you already know the entire future.

If you would like, try a two-minute planning experiment. Choose one period within the next twenty-four hours and give it a small activity that feels acceptable even while uncertainty remains. It could be a trip to the store, a short conversation, or a quiet evening at home. Before deciding, ask:

  1. Is my waiting based on a specific agreement or a possible version of the future?
  2. Which need of mine would still matter if no message arrived today?
  3. What small part of the day can I plan without waiting for an answer on someone else’s behalf?

When the time is up, stop working through every possible scenario. If you feel worse, stop sooner and return to your surroundings. You do not have to go out or prove anything today. Perhaps saying to your friend, “I can come for half an hour,” will be enough. Hope can remain. Alongside it, there can be one concrete decision your day no longer has to postpone.

Sources and limits

This is general writing for self-understanding, not a diagnosis or therapy. Research findings do not explain every individual experience. These questions are an original editorial adaptation, not a clinically tested intervention.

  1. Sweeny — On the Experience of Awaiting Uncertain News (2018)
  2. Sweeny et al. — Two Definitions of Waiting Well (2016)
  3. Sahib et al. — Intolerance of Uncertainty and Emotion Regulation (2023)
  4. Näsling et al. — Effect of Psychotherapy on Intolerance of Uncertainty (2024)
  5. NHS — Tackling Your Worries (publication year not stated)
  6. WHO — Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (2020)
← All articles