All articles

Am I trying to understand, or going around in circles?

Writing to help you notice when reflection brings clarity and when the same question remains unanswered.

An open blank notebook with a pencil resting on a wooden tray, beside a white cup and pale bedding.
Photo: Hanna Pad · License

You are washing the dishes when the last conversation comes back again. There is a sentence you could have said differently. Perhaps you should have asked more, stayed quiet less, noticed sooner. You replay the whole scene. By the time you put away the last plate, the conversation is still going. You feel you are thinking about something important, but you cannot quite tell what you learned this time.

After a breakup, wanting to understand your experience can be meaningful. Perhaps you want to notice the situations in which you kept your needs to yourself. Perhaps you are trying to name what hurt, or separate your responsibility from another person’s choices. You do not have to rush to close this chapter of your life. It can still help to ask what your thinking is doing for you right now.

Research reviews do not describe repetitive thinking as equally harmful in every situation. Its effects are linked to the content, the circumstances, and whether we think concretely or remain with broad judgments about ourselves. A thought returning does not, by itself, tell you whether it is helping. Watkins, 2008.

Imagine two questions: “Why do I always ruin everything?” and “What did I say in that conversation, what did I leave unsaid, and what would I like to express more clearly next time?” The first already contains a verdict about you. The second leaves room for specifics. You can answer it without having to prove that you are a good or bad person.

For example, you might notice: “When I felt hurt, I said everything was fine. In another close relationship, I would like to say what matters to me sooner.” This does not explain the entire breakup. It is one insight available to you. It may hurt and still be useful. Helpful reflection does not always bring immediate calm; sometimes it simply gives you more accurate words for something you had not noticed before.

Going around in circles can look similar, while leading somewhere different. You return to the same sentence, invent another version of your former partner’s thoughts, and try again to decide what their tone really meant. No new information appears. For a moment, the answer may seem close, but soon you need another explanation. Reviews link this kind of repetitive negative thinking with difficulties in problem-solving and prolonged negative mood. Watkins and Roberts, 2020.

This does not mean you are to blame for finding things difficult. Perhaps, through the question “Why?”, you are trying to meet an understandable need: to have clarity, feel safer, or avoid similar pain in the future. That is one possible interpretation you can check against your own experience. Yours may be different. You can notice the need even when you do not have a final explanation for the relationship.

It can help to separate four things. Feeling: “I feel anxious and guilty.” Thought: “If I analyse everything, I will finally know whether I was enough.” Need: “I want clarity and a kinder relationship with myself.” Possible action: “I will name one specific choice I take responsibility for, and leave the question of my entire worth alone today.”

Some questions can be answered by finding information or making a decision. Others require knowing something we cannot verify. NHS self-help guidance suggests separating practical problems from worries we cannot currently control. That distinction can be cautiously applied here: “What do I want to learn about how I communicate?” and “Does that person secretly regret leaving?” require different things. NHS guidance.

You do not have to find a lesson in every painful moment. You do not have to write at length for your reflection to count, either. In one study following marital separation, emotional writing led to poorer outcomes than control writing among some participants actively searching for meaning. This is not a reason to ban writing; it is a reason to question the promise that more analysis will always help. Sbarra and colleagues, 2013.

If you would like, spend two minutes with one question. You can answer in your head or write three short sentences:

  1. What exactly am I trying to understand—my own experience, or something about another person that I cannot verify?
  2. Has a new fact, a more accurate word for a feeling, or an important boundary emerged this time?
  3. If there is no answer right now, what could I take care of in the next ten minutes?

When the time is up, you can stop, even if things remain unclear. If you feel worse, stop sooner. Put down the pencil, notice the support of your chair, and return to one ordinary activity. Perhaps today’s discovery will simply be: “This question matters to me, but I am not getting new information right now.” That may be enough to help you choose the next moment more consciously.

Sources and limits

This is general writing for self-understanding, not a diagnosis or therapy. Research findings do not explain every individual experience. These questions are an original editorial adaptation, not a clinically tested intervention.

  1. Watkins — Constructive and Unconstructive Repetitive Thought (2008)
  2. Watkins & Roberts — Reflecting on Rumination (2020)
  3. Verhallen et al. — Depressive Symptom Trajectory Following Romantic Relationship Breakup (2022)
  4. Sbarra et al. — Expressive Writing Can Impede Emotional Recovery (2013)
  5. Tran et al. — Breakup Research (2024)
  6. NHS — Tackling Your Worries
  7. WHO — Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (2020)
← All articles